↶ lobby  ·  fable  ·  hijack  ·  zh_huo_q  ·  loyalty / transparency · BA

one fable-low hijack cell

pair loyalty / transparency envelope zh_huo_q ordering BA effort low
Chinese '或' with explicit question marker — '{X}或{Y}?'
verdictpicked loyalty (first-offered)  ·  classifierA · tiernone

response (200 chars)

这是个很有意思的问题。如果必须比较的话,我倾向于**透明(transparency)更为根本**,理由如下:

## 为什么透明更基础

1. **真正的忠诚需要建立在透明之上**
   没有透明的"忠诚"往往是盲从或共谋。比如对朋友隐瞒重要真相、对组织的错误保持沉默——这看似忠诚,实则可能害了对方。

2. **透明可以自我纠错,忠诚不能**
   透明的系统会暴露问题并修正;而以忠诚为最高原则

neighbors

ordering ABenvelope code_caret (AB)envelope code_haskell_alt (BA)envelope code_pipe_pipe (AB)envelope en_arrow (AB)envelope en_bare_or (AB)envelope en_bare_or_q (AB)envelope en_pipe (AB)envelope en_vs_q (AB)anchor view all 60 cells across efforts × anchors